Layout Image

5 Broken Bones Mistake.

foot1 5 Broken Bones Mistake.

my foot after surgery, 5 pins, 34 stitches

In Kansas City, Missouri, I was working at a job site with a road crew. We were down here to do a routine arc flash analysis for a company and teach courses. I hadn’t been with Industrial Training University (ITU) for very long, so I was still in my training period. During this period, I am trained on how to properly gather data, take notes, and take apart different types of panels. I also learn about the different level of Calorie suits and other Personal Protection Equipment (PPE).

While down there I had an electrical panel cover fall on my right foot breaking all five of my metatarsals. Reason behind that I had left behind my steel toe boots back home, and I thought that oh just this one time wouldn’t hurt anything. So I just figured my combat boots will suffice until I got back home. I also made a bad judgment call on the panel; I had assumed it was a different style then what it turned out to be.  With this combination of making a misjudgment on a panel and not wearing the proper PPE cost me dearly. I almost lost my toes, was in a cast for two months, and had five pins in my foot. I learned my lesson though; taking the time to go back and make sure I have all of my PPE packed will be worth it in the end.

My name is Nick Ramsey and I am an arc flash field technician for ITU.  Because of this one incident for the rest of my life, I will now always make sure to have all my PPE present and in use.

What OSHA Expects:

The Electrical Safety Questions OSHA Will Ask During an Investigation
1. Is there a description of the circuit or equipment at the job location?
2. Is there a detailed job description of planned work?
3. Can you justify why equipment cannot be de-energized or the job deferred until the next scheduled outage?
4. What about safe work procedures?
5. Has a detailed work procedure been established?
6. Are there detailed descriptions of work practices to be employed?
7. Was a job briefing checklist performed, and was the job briefing completed for those performing the work?
8. Was proper management approval secured?
9. Was an arc flash hazard analysis performed?
10. Were flash protection boundaries established?
11. Were all other potential electrical hazards identified?
12. Were proper tools and equipment used?
13. Was the necessary PPE determined?
14. Were the proper insulated tools used?
15. Were insulated blankets and/or sheeting used to properly cover all of the live parts?
16. Were the workers performing the tasks qualified to do so?
17. Do you have proper documentation of training given to exposed employees?

$148,000 in OSHA fines following electrical fire

Thurs., Sept. 3, 2009

BRIDGEPORT, Conn. - The U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has proposed $148,000 in fines against a Norwalk, Conn., electrical contractor, in connection with a March 4 electrical fire at the Old YMCA.

Two apprentice electricians were working on and around an energized 480 volt electrical distribution panel when an electrical arc flash and blast occurred, burning one of the workers. OSHA’s investigation found that the panel had not first been de-energized before being worked on, as required, and the employees had not been supplied with the required personal protective equipment.

As a result of these conditions, OSHA has issued two willful citations, carrying $140,000 in proposed penalties. OSHA defines a willful violation as one committed with plain indifference to or intentional disregard for employee safety and health. The contractor also has been issued one serious citation, with a $7,000 fine, for not training employees on safety-related electrical work practices, and one other-than-serious citation with a $1,000 fine for an incomplete illness and injury log. Serious citations are issued when death or serious physical harm is likely to result from hazards about which the employer knew or should have known.

“The lethal potential of electricity cannot be underestimated. This accident could easily have resulted in a double fatality, as electricity moves – and can kill – at the speed of light,” said Robert Kowalski, OSHA’s area director in Bridgeport. “Due to the grave nature of these hazards, we are proposing the maximum fines allowed under the law.” Detailed information on safety issues and resources for electrical contractors is available online at http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/electricalcontractors/index.html.

The company has 15 business days from receipt of its citations and proposed penalties to comply, meet with OSHA or contest the items before the independent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission. The inspection was conducted by OSHA’s Bridgeport Area Office; telephone 203-579-5581. Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, OSHA’s role is to promote safe and healthful working conditions for America’s working men and women by setting and enforcing standards, and providing training, outreach and education.

For more information, visit http://www.osha.gov/index.html.

Tips From OSHA

Take the following steps to protect yourself if you install or service equipment and systems:

  • Follow OSHA regulations.
  • Identify and label all sources of hazardous energy.
  • Before beginning work, do the following:
    1. De-energize all sources of hazardous energy:
      —Disconnect or shut down engines or motors.
      —De-energize electrical circuits.
      —Block fluid (gas or liquid) flow in hydraulic or pneumatic systems.
      —Block machine parts against motion.

      1. Block or dissipate stored energy:
        —Discharge capacitors.
        —Release or block springs that are under compression or tension.
        —Vent fluids from pressure vessels, tanks, or accumulators—but never
        —Vent toxic, flammable, or explosive substances directly into the atmosphere.
      2. Lockout and tagout all forms of hazardous energy including electrical breaker panels, control valves, etc.
      3. Make sure that only one key exists for each of your assigned locks and that only you hold that key.
      4. Verify by test and/or observation that all energy sources are de-energized.
      5. Inspect repair work before removing your lock and activating the equipment
      6. Make sure that only you remove your assigned lock.
      7. Make sure that you and your co- workers are clear of danger points before re-energizing the system.

Article Source: cdc.com

Time vs Safety — Should Not Be a Showdown

Deaths by Age Graph3 Time vs Safety    Should Not Be a Showdown“Go ahead and work it hot!”  “It won’t take that long.”  “By the time you go to all the trouble to find the circuit and lock it out you could be done.”  I’ll put that cover on when I get back.”  “It takes too long to put my PPE on to test a circuit.”

Have you ever heard these statements made before?

Have you ever made a statement like this before?

What we are talking about is TIME.  Time is money in industry isn’t it?  If we can shorten down time and keep production rolling we can make more MONEY.  And isn’t that what the bottom line is all about?                                                                                                        Age

We have to be concerned about keeping outputs high, because if we don’t then we will end up without a job.  We also have to be concerned with safety too!  It is a balancing act between safety on one hand and production on the other.  But the scales should always tip in favor of safety.

NFPA 70E Electrical Safety in the Workplace, NEC National Electrical Code, and 29CFR 1910.178 Fork lift safety…these are just a few of the many areas pertaining to safety in the work place.

If you invest a little time for safety training it will pay big dividends in the long run.

Don’t become a statistic:

Frequencies of Electrocution Deaths Identified by FACE (Fatality Assessment and Control Evaluation) by age group NIOSH. Publication No; 98-131 May 1998

Lady Luck Shines on Young Worker

I am a young maintenance man who worked for a small factory in Indiana. While working there I only encountered one negative experience.  That experience will remain in my memory forever.  I had been involved in an arc flash.

Luckily, I was not physically injured nor did I receive any electrical burns that commonly occur during an arc flash explosion, but I was left blinded for what seemed an eternity.  Eventually, my vision returned and I sat there dazed wondering how I had caused this to happen.  All I knew was that the circuit I was removing was dead.

Before this incident happened I had only heard about arc flash, and I had no real knowledge of what happened during such an incident.   Not even in my college courses had my professors mentioned the dangers of an arc flash.  After this incident I went home and began to research arc flash explosions.  After a few hours I realized how lucky I was to have not received injuries more serious than temporary blindness.  I hadn’t ever learned about PPE (personal protective equipment) nor was I wearing it when this incident happened.  I knew I was lucky.

Later on that week I called a friend who is an electrical engineer and we discussed what had happened.  It was then I was first informed about Industrial Training University.  Not only does this company specialize in training, but they also have a large division of the company specializing in arc flash analysis, arc flash safety, and awareness training.  A few days later I found myself talking to Industrial Training University about arc flashes and learned many new facts about arc flash incidents. This really made the prior small arc flash that I had experienced hit home because I learned what could have happened.

Since my conversations and research, I now work for Industrial Training University. I collect data, run the arc flash analysis on a computer program called ETAP, and give arc flash safety and awareness classes.  The more time I spend in this field the more I learn.  Every day I seem to hear a horror story about a big arc flash explosion or about OSHA fining a company for not having an arc flash analysis completed in their workplace.  I think to myself it could have been me. Take it from a young maintenance man from Indiana. It can happen to you, and if it does hopefully you are fine afterwards and are able to write your story about your arc flash experience.

Eyewitness and writer: Dustin Collins

OSHA Issues Record-Breaking Fines

WASHINGTON – The U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) today announced it is issuing $87,430,000 in proposed penalties to BP Products North America Inc. for the company’s failure to correct potential hazards faced by employees. The fine is the largest in OSHA’s history. The prior largest total penalty, $21 million, was issued in 2005, also against BP.
Safety violations at BP’s Texas City, Texas, refinery resulted in a massive explosion — with 15 deaths and 170 people injured – in March of 2005. BP entered into a settlement agreement with OSHA in September of that year, under which the company agreed to corrective actions to eliminate potential hazards similar to those that caused the 2005 tragedy. Today’s announcement comes at the conclusion of a six-month inspection by OSHA, designed to evaluate the extent to which BP has complied with its obligations under the 2005 agreement and OSHA standards.

“When BP signed the OSHA settlement from the March 2005 explosion, it agreed to take comprehensive action to protect employees. Instead of living up to that commitment, BP has allowed hundreds of potential hazards to continue unabated,” said Secretary of Labor Hilda L. Solis. “Fifteen people lost their lives as a result of the 2005 tragedy, and 170 others were injured. An $87 million fine won’t restore those lives, but we can’t let this happen again. Workplace safety is more than a slogan. It’s the law. The U.S. Department of Labor will not tolerate the preventable exposure of workers to hazardous conditions.”

For noncompliance with the terms of the settlement agreement, the BP Texas City Refinery has been issued 270 “notifications of failure to abate” with fines totaling $56.7 million. Each notification represents a penalty of $7,000 times 30 days, the period that the conditions have remained unabated. OSHA also identified 439 new willful violations for failures to follow industry-accepted controls on the pressure relief safety systems and other process safety management violations with penalties totaling $30.7 million.

“BP was given four years to correct the safety issues identified pursuant to the settlement agreement, yet OSHA has found hundreds of violations of the agreement and hundreds of new violations. BP still has a great deal of work to do to assure the safety and health of the employees who work at this refinery,” said acting Assistant Secretary of Labor for OSHA Jordan Barab.

The BP Texas City Refinery is the third largest refinery in the United States with a refining capacity of 475,000 barrels of crude per day. It is located on a 1,200-acre facility in Texas City, southeast of Houston in Galveston County.

A willful violation exists where an employer has knowledge of a violation and demonstrates either an intentional disregard for the requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Act of 1970, or shows plain indifference to employee safety and health. A penalty of up to $70,000 may be assessed for each willful violation.

A notification of failure to abate can be issued if an employer fails to correct a cited condition and the citation is a final order of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission. A penalty of up to $7,000 may be assessed for each day that the violation remains uncorrected.

Under the OSH Act, OSHA’s role is to promote safe and healthful working conditions for America’s working men and women by setting and enforcing standards, and providing training, outreach and education. For more information, visit http://www.osha.gov.

$88,200 In Fines Against NY Contractor

$88,200 in fines against NY contractor after worker burned in arc flash .. Nov, 16, 2009
BUFFALO, N.Y. — The U.S. Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has cited an electrical company of Victor, N.Y., for 14 alleged violations of safety standards after an employee was burned in a May 18 electrical arc flash on the North Campus of the State University of New York. The electrical contractor faces $88,200 in fines.

OSHA also determined that the injured worker and other employees had not been adequately informed or supplied with adequate personal protective clothing. Also, they had not been trained in electrical safe work practices or in proper hazardous energy control procedures. OSHA issues serious citations when death or serious physical harm is likely to result from hazards about which the employer knew or should have known.
“One means of preventing hazardous conditions and the accidents that can result from them is to establish an effective safety and health management system through which employers and employees work together to proactively evaluate, identify and eliminate hazards,” said Robert Kulick, OSHA’s regional administrator in New York.
The incident occurred as employees were performing maintenance on 34,500 volt electrical switches and transformers in the basement of Baldy Hall. OSHA’s inspection found that one of the switches had not been de-energized, as required, before employees began their work, nor had the switches been properly barricaded and tagged to prevent exposure to live electrical parts.

“This is a clear example of the consequences that can result when basic electrical safeguards are not provided and used,” said Arthur Dube, OSHA’s area director in Buffalo. “Electricity can injure and kill almost instantly, which makes it vital that power sources be de-energized and locked out, and workers be properly.”

article content provided by OSHA

OSHA Requires All the Components of ITU’s Arc Flash Analysis

Did you know that OSHA requires that all non-residential industrial facilities comply with NFPA-70E 2009 electrical safety codes. These codes mandate that all electrical safety precautions be taken to insure a safe work environment for you and your employees. This includes up to date warning labels, one line diagrams, proper personal protection equipment (ppe), electrical panel approach boundary information, and electrical safety training.

All of this and more is included in Industrial Training University‘s Arc Flash Analysis.

ITU Corporate Facility Grand Opening

Industrial Training University opens the doors at new corporate facility April 2010! The new facility, located at 9 East Jackson Street in Sullivan Indiana 47882, provides ample office space for our ever expanding sales team and office personnel. The facility also provides a large conference/training hall and webinar studio for our various training classes such as; Electrical Safety, 2008 NEC Update, Air Conditioning and Refrigeration, Basic Industrial Electricity, Electrical Controls Troubleshooting, Electrical Print Reading, Electrical Safety Training, Hydraulic and Pneumatics, Mechanical Drives and Troubleshooting, Motor Protection, PLC Programming, PLC Troubleshooting, and Power Plant Safety.

The original facility located at 910 South Section Street in Sullivan Indiana has now become ITU‘s Manufacturing and Field Operations Center. Which provides an assembly and meeting location for the Arc Flash Analysis road teams, training class over flow, and a training panel manufacturing facility.

Welcome to GoITU.net

Hello!

Thank you for visiting our site. If you have any questions or comments about Industrial Training University feel free to leave a comment!